Young Lawyers And Case Laws

بہت اچھا فیصلہ 2020 MLD 1147 ✅ ♦️ Prosecution of a spouse in a family case, who has sustained injury to the other spouse ♦️ It is the duty of the family courts to consider the following guiding principles. a) After recording of evidence by the Family Court, if it appears that any spouse who has suffered the psychological and physical injuries at the hands of other spouse covering under the offences referred in Part-II i.e. Sections 337A(i), 337F(i), 341, 342, 343, 344345, 346, 352 and 509 PPC, the learned Family Judge has to proceed against the perpetrator and award sentence in accordance with the law. b) The Family Court while considering the offences referred in Part-II of the Schedule should give clear findings and verdict while dilating upon the evidence, even with or without framing of charge of that offence as the legislation has used the term “notwithstanding a...

P L D 2000 Lahore 355 ✅ ♦️ Dower, entries in Nikha nama ♦️ Before Mrs. Fakhar‑un‑Nisa Khokhar, J MUHAMMAD ASLAM‑‑‑Petitioner versus Mst. SURAYA ‑‑‑ Respondent Writ Petition No. 3547 of 2000, decided on 2nd March, 2000. (a) Muslim Family Laws Ordinance (VII of 1961)‑‑‑‑ ‑‑‑‑S.5‑‑‑West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), S.23‑‑­Registration of marriage‑‑‑Validity of registered marriage‑‑‑Jurisdiction of Family Court‑‑‑Validity of marriage registered under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance, 1961, would not be questioned by Family Court nor any evidence in regard thereto would be admissible before the said Court‑‑‑‑If marriage was questioned on ground of fraud or misrepresentation, remedy would not be available with the Family Court, but with the Court of general jurisdiction‑‑‑Legislature had provided that four copies of Nikahnama should be prepared, one was to be kept by Registrar of Nikah, second one to be sent to concerned Municipal Corporation, Municipal Committee or...

  2020 S C M R 1 [Supreme Court of Pakistan] Present: Mian Saqib Nisar, C.J. Umar Ata Bandial, Maqbool Baqar, Faisal Arab and Ijaz ul Ahsan, JJ GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through Secretary Health Department and others---Appellants Versus Dr. NADEEM RIZVI and others---Respondents Civil Appeals Nos. 125-K to 131-K and 2306 to 2309 of 2016 and Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1254-K and 8973 of 2018 and Civil Petition 2312-L of 2018, decided on 17th January, 2019.        (Against the impugned judgment dated 04.07.2016 passed by the learned High Court of Sindh in Constitutional Petition No. D-1692/2011, etc. and dated 03.04.2018 passed by the learned Lahore High Court in I.C.A. No. 1359/2017) Per Ijaz ul Ahsan, J; Mian Saqib Nisar, CJ, Umar Ata Bandial and Faisal Arab, JJ agreeing; Maqbool Baqar, J, dissenting. (a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 270AA, Cls. 8 & 9---Transfer of certain hospitals and a national museum from the Federation to the ...